When Viewing Examples of Student Work:

Often a single example of work may not demonstrate all the required objectives for a particular assignment. Instead students should collectively consider: the required objectives for each assignment, the multiple examples presented on this website and during in class presentations. As well ideas discovered through a student's independent research in combination with various examples and ideas presented by instructor will ultimately be the best approach for synthesizing ideas and reaching the requirements (and unique outcome) for any particular course project. Attendance and participation in all classes and meeting with instructor with Art Assignments in progress well in advance of deadlines will increase chances for desired grade. To access all posts and links for the art part of this course go on the right side of this course website."LISTINGS FOR LECTURES (COURSE TOPICS) & ASSIGNMENTS"

Course Syllabus (Art Part) for Mathematics in Art – FA 1020 / Math 1020 May and June 2013



Course Syllabus – FA 1020 / Math 1020      Mathematics in Art A01     May 08- June 28, 2013

Instructors:    Derek Brueckner, Art Part of Course
Dr. Michelle Davidson, Math Part of Course

Office for Derek Brueckner: ART Lab 460
Art part of Course Website/Blog: http://derekbruecknermathinartcourse.blogspot.ca/

Office Hours for Derek Brueckner:
   after class on Wednesdays & Fridays until 12:30 pm
 (or feel free to e-mail instructor to arrange for mutually agreeable time)

Location and Lecture Times:
136 ART LAB  Wednesdays & Fridays  9:00 am - 11:30 am

Estimate costs of materials & supplies: $60 - $125

Course Purpose: In the ART component of the Mathematics in Art course (FA 1020 & Math 1020 courses) we will examine and explore the appearance of mathematics and mathematical ideas within the visual arts (fine arts, design and visual culture). Art assignments for the Mathematics in Art course will require using art materials in combination with ideas from the mathematical and the visual art concepts discussed in the course.

Instructional Methods: The art portion of this course will include primarily lectures and presentation of examples along with some class discussions and art materials demonstrations.

Required Readings: Math and Art Textbook, Lecture Notes and course Website/Blog

Grading/Evaluation:
Assignment 1 - Perspective Assignment   5% of course                    (set by Derek Brueckner)
Assignment 2 - Sketchbook Assignment   15% of course                  (set by Derek Brueckner)
Assignment 3 – Final Project Assignment   20% of course                (set by Derek Brueckner)

Mid –Term and Final Exam 60%                                                           (set by Dr Davidson)

Details on sketchbooks and the projects will be discussed in class. Deadline dates are included on assignment sheets, in on line information and in schedule of this syllabus and late submissions will be penalized or receive a ZERO GRADE. (See page 4 in Evaluation section of this syllabus for further information regarding late submissions)

Notification of Grades for Art Assignments:
Grades for all Art assignments will be posted on Desire2Learn: https://universityofmanitoba.desire2learn.com
Students must ensure they are registered with Desire 2 Learn in order to access their art assignment grades.

Class Attendance Policy:
Regular attendance is expected of all students in all courses. The Office of the School of Art will issue a letter of warning when a student has had three unexcused absences for any course in a given term. An instructor may initiate procedures to debar a student from attending classes and from final examinations and/or from receiving credit where unexcused absences exceed those permitted.

If a student is in violation of this policy, a letter will be sent.
Page 1
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________








FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  


DEADLINES* of Art Assignments and Tentative Schedule of Mathematics in Art Topics and Presentations by Derek Brueckner (Art Instructor)

Wednesday                                                      Friday

May 8, 2013
Introduction to art part of course 
and review of art course website

May 10, 2013
Euclidean Geometry and Constructions
and presentation of Sketchbook Assignment

May 15, 2013
Perspective and presentation of Perspective Assignment
May 17, 2013
Golden Ratio: rectangle, triangles
Fibonacci sequence
May 22, 2013
Symmetry
Groups of Symmetry
May 24, 2013
Colour Theory & Art Materials Demonstration and presentation of Final Project Assignment

May 29, 2013
Midterm Review
* Perspective Assignment due 
at beginning of class
Symmetry
Groups of Symmetry (continued)

May 31, 2013
Midterm
(Midterm given and administered by
Dr Davidson)

June 5, 2013
Fractals

June 7, 2013
Conic Sections and Constructions
June 12, 2013
Art Materials Demonstrations
June 14, 2013
Platonic Solids
* Sketchbook Assignment due at beginning of class

June 19, 2013
Hyperbolic Geometry and introduction to Topology

June 21, 2013
* Final Project Assignment due at beginning of class
Topology

June 26, 2013
Final Exam Review

   June 28, 2013
FINAL EXAM
(Final Exam given and administered by Dr. Davidson)


June 13, Thursday  -  Last day to VW from Mathematics in Art course

Electronic Devices In Class:
Cell phones and most other electronic devices must be turned off during class time. This also includes no text messaging during class time. 
Page 2

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________




FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  

Electronic Notification:
You will also be required to have a University of Manitoba email account. This email account will ensure cohesive communication with instructor and all enrolled students in this course. The U of M email accounts are free for all University of Manitoba students and will be imperative for this course. As a university policy it is mandatory that all students maintain and regularly monitor a University of Manitoba email account. Critical information from the registrar, instructors and the School of Art will be relayed to you through the Web mail, Jump and Aurora electronic notification systems.
Create your University of Manitoba email account at:

Forward your U of M email account to another email address:

For assistance regarding your U of M email account visit Information Services and Technology at 123 Fletcher Argue or contact by Telephone at: 474-9249 or Email at support@umanitoba.ca
People may use their other email accounts to contact art instructor but you still must be able to receive and monitor emails using your U of M email address.

Plagiarism and Cheating Policy:
To plagiarize is to take ideas or words of another person and pass them off as one’s own. In short, it is stealing something intangible rather than an object. Obviously, it is not necessary to state the source of well known or easily verifiable facts, but students are expected to acknowledge the sources of ideas and expressions they use in their written work, whether quoted directly or paraphrased. This applies to diagrams, statistical tables and the like, as well as to written material, and materials or information from Internet sources. To provide adequate and correct documentation is not only an indication of academic honesty but is also a courtesy, which enables the reader to consult these sources with ease. Failure to do so constitutes plagiarism. It will also be considered plagiarism and/or cheating if a student submits a term paper written in whole or in part by someone other than him/herself, or copies the answer or answers of another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment. Plagiarism or any other form of cheating in examinations, or term tests (e.g., crib notes) is subject to serious academic penalty (e.g. suspension or expulsion from the faculty or university). A student found guilty of contributing to cheating in examinations or term assignments is also subject to serious academic penalty.

Similarly, to copy, parts, or to reproduce everything from an artist’s individual artwork and pass them off as one’s own is also considered a form of plagiarism. When completing assignments or presenting work done in self-directed studio art projects, students should be avoiding this practice, since what is expected is that you will originate the ‘look or ‘style’ of the work from your own responses to the subject or ideas in question. To do otherwise, through the knowing use of printed or internet reproductions of published artists work would be academically dishonest, except in cases where to make direct copy was a requirements of the assignment by an instructor, or that your idea required such a response. In those cases it is clear as to the intent to copy and is a pubic aspect of the meaning of the work.

Return of Student Work:
The recommended retention period for unclaimed student work is no less than 2 weeks. After two weeks unclaimed assignments will become property of the School of Art and will be disposed of at its discretion.

Page 3

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________







FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  
   
Statement on Student Participation in the Presentation or Discussion of Art:
At the School of Art, numerous required and elective courses contain content that includes working from the nude model and some language, imagery, or dialogue that may offend students. In particular, the School of Art provides comprehensive art training that requires use of the nude model in some courses. In viewing and discussing works of art, the School of Art encourages the broadest possible tolerance consistent with Canadian law.

Access to School of Art Computer Lab:
Access to the School of Art computer lab in room 340 ART Lab 8:00am to 4:30pm Monday to Friday
If you are are not a school of art student who requires access to the computer lab or you require access out of weekday hours contact Franc Fernandez at Franc.Fernandez@ad.umanitoba.ca or 474-8801


EVALUATION  - Grading Criteria:

Assignment Deadlines:
All assignments are due at the beginning of class, once the instructor has left the classroom the assignment is considered late. Assignments submitted late after class on the day of assignment deadline will be deducted one letter grade. (For example an assignment that is one day late that is evaluated at a B+ letter grade will receive a B letter grade) No assignments will be accepted beyond 1pm on the deadline date. Any assignment submitted beyond 1pm of any assignment deadline date will receive a ZERO Grade.

Please note that the School of Art will not accept assignments at the office. Arrangements have to be made with the instructor in advance of assignment deadlines to submit late assignments.

For an exception to the late deduction or a zero grade a Doctor’s note with signature must be submitted clearly indicating specific dates effected by illness, which should obviously include and encompass any pertinent assignment deadline. If the Doctor’s note does not specify and encompass the pertinent dates the assignment will not be eligible for an extension without repercussions of a zero grade or deductions.

Letter Grade System:
The grade of ‘D’ is regarded as marginal in most courses by all faculties and schools. It contributes to decreasing a sessional or cumulative Grade Point Average to less than 2.0. The course in which ‘D’ standing is obtained need not be repeated except by probationary students in certain faculties or where a grade of ‘C’ or better is required in a prerequisite subject. It may be repeated for the purpose of improving a grade point average. Students in doubt as to the status of their record should consult an advisor in their faculty or school.

Letter Grade                Grade Point Value      
A+                               4.5                                                       Exceptional
A                                 4.0 - 4.4                                               Excellent
B+                                3.5 - 3.9                                               Very Good
B                                  3.0 - 3.4                                               Good
C+                                2.5 - 2.9                                               Satisfactory
C                                  2.0 - 2.4                                               Adequate
D                                  1.0 - 1.9                                               Marginal
F                                  0 – 0.9                                                 Failure
P                                                                                              Pass
S                                                                                              Standing
Page  4

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________











FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  
 

EVALUATION  - Grading Criteria (continued):

A to A+ (GPA of 4.0 to 4.5) Excellent to Exceptional:
Reserved for Exceptional performances and usually achieved by a minority of students. The “A to A+” grades indicate rare students who are extremely self-initiating, consistently exceed expectations and demonstrate unique and astute comprehensions of assignment objectives and requirements.  The “A to A+” assignment overall consistently demonstrate the ability to critically analyze and to consistently synthesize issues and problems in a very sophisticated resolution. Specifically there is consistently clear evidence of extremely advanced levels of research that perfectly synthesize art materials, art process, art concepts and mathematical concepts all together.

Grade of A+ (GPA of 4.5) Exceptional: The “A+” assignment demonstrates an exceptionally rare and perfect command and broad range of chosen art materials, processes, math with art concepts and overall thorough contextual awareness of assignment requirements and objectives. Perfect treatment of the assignment is presented consistently throughout the entire assignment in an original, logical and convincing manner. The “A+” assignment has perfectly, consistently and clearly articulated formal ideas and conceptual ideas, which are innovative, complex, and thoroughly researched. All aspects of the assignment objectives and requirements are extremely clear, flawless, engagingly executed and perfectly organized. Overall the “A+” assignment demonstrates clear, rare versatility, and perfect command of the art materials, art process and in combining both math and art concepts with art materials and art processes.  The “A+” assignment consistently exceeds all the minimum expectations of the assignment while demonstrating perfect, exceptionally sophisticated and original insights in the interpretation of all the assignment’s objectives and requirements. 

Grade of A (GPA of 4.0 to 4.4) Excellent: The “A” assignment demonstrates a confident, broad range of chosen materials, processes, math with art concepts and overall thorough contextual awareness of the assignment’s requirements and objectives. Generally the ”A” assignment consistently demonstrates an excellent level of research, criticality, and sophisticated versatility that has a breadth of formal and conceptual skill sets. Like the A+ assignment the work consistently exceeds all the minimum requirements of the assignment.  All of the assignment’s objectives in terms of quality and quantity are achieved in an excellent manner, which is rarely seen by the instructor. The “A” assignment has consistently and clearly articulated formal and conceptual ideas, which are innovative, complex, and thoroughly researched. Overall the A assignment has an extreme amount of consistency in achieving and exceeding assignment requirements and objectives, but does not demonstrate the ultimate perfection of the A+ assignment.


Grade of B to B+ (GPA of 3.0 to 3.9) Good to Very Good:
This is a good or very good assignment in most ways, but it is generally less thoughtful than an “A” work. Normally the largest number of students achieves the combined category of B to B+ grades. Often the “B to B+” assignments are those that mostly repeat what the instructor has taught along with the presented images and text in class and on line. The “B to B+” assignment presents itself in a way that makes it apparent that the student understands the use of art materials, art processes, combining Math and art concepts and the assignment’s overall requirements/objectives, but does not add much to them. The “B to B+” assignment may be less sophisticated than an “A” assignment, but the “B to B+” assignment may still be reasonably competent in synthesizing both math and art concepts together with art materials and art processes.
Page 5

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________










FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  

 
EVALUATION  - Grading Criteria (continued):

Grade of B+ (GPA of 3.5 to 3.9) Very Good: Generally the “B+” assignment objectives are achieved with less sophistication and innovation than the “A” assignment. At times the “B+” assignment may even offer some originality or go beyond certain parts of assignment requirements but simultaneously may be disregarding some of the assignment’s other objectives, or some of the other assignment requirements/objectives are presented in a less sophisticated manner than the “A” assignment. For example the “B+” grade could indicate a very good grasp in the use of art materials, or art processes or in combining math and art concepts in one area, but simultaneously only have a satisfactory grasp of art and math concepts in another area of the same assignment. As well in some “B+” examples, slight problems may occur in terms of either art materials or art process and or problems in synthesizing both math and art concepts together with art materials and process, or the “B+” assignment may have one or more subtle combinations of these problems. 

Grade of B (GPA of 3.0 to 3.4) Good: The “B” assignment could have variables of problems ranging from the simple execution of assignment to an inconsistency in achieving assignment requirements and objectives. For example the “B” assignment may have a good demonstration of concepts but the execution of art materials may be very straight forward and or there may not be any innovation and or sophistication in terms of synthesizing art materials and art processes with both math and art concepts. As well the assignment could show a reasonable ability with chosen art materials, processes and concepts but may have inconsistencies in addressing the assignment’s objectives and requirements regarding combining math and art concepts together. Specifically there could be some problems with the interaction of math and art concepts and or examples where math and art concepts are combined with art materials and art processes in simple and or unoriginal ways. There could also be problems in various other combinations regarding synthesizing math/art concepts with art materials and art process.

Grade of C to C+ (GPA of 2.0 to 2.9) Adequate to Satisfactory): The C to C+ assignment demonstrates a very basic understanding of most concepts and or presents the assignments objectives in an extremely simple way and does not treat it thoroughly or does not synthesize the assignment into an entirely clear or consistent manner. As well in the C to C+ assignment in some areas the assignment may be a very good demonstration of concepts and or use of materials and art processes but in that same assignment some key assignment requirements or objectives may be weakly demonstrated and or missing completely. Particularly in the C assignment the ideas are visually and or conceptually vague and may even appear to be contradictory, or visually noisy or confused. Strong efforts by a student may be given for a C assignment, but ultimately the work struggles to clearly convey the assignment objectives in terms of demonstrating a synthesis between math and art concepts working together when combining art materials and art processes.

Grade of D (GPA of 1.0 to 1.9) Marginal: Seriously flawed. The assignment neither demonstrates an understanding of the material nor articulates any coherent ideas or concepts. The assignment might wander among several ideas with out developing any single one idea or requirement/objective. There is no focus in this kind of work usually culminating with very minimal assignment objectives being demonstrated at all. Often a D assignment will be presented as incomplete or unfinished. In a “D” assignment a student might rely on others’ work rather than developing her/his ideas. The instructor might wonder if the student had tried at all in terms of time and or effort. Overall there are significant problems with all of the assignment’s objectives and requirements
Page 6

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________






FA 1020/Math 1020    Mathematics in Art A01     ART Instructor: Derek Brueckner  
 

EVALUATION  - Grading Criteria (continued):
Grade of F (GPA of 0 to 0.9) Failure: Little redemptive value appears in “F” work. The assignment fails to address the assignment in fundamental ways. There is no real answer to any of the problems posed by the assignment, and there is no real engagement in the topic in any way. The work often fails to be coherent at all and demonstrates no effort or achievement of any assignment objectives. Generally the student who receives an F on their assignment does very little of the required work, often the F assignment is extremely incomplete, definitely demonstrates a lack of any effort and or time put into the assignment, and often their classroom attendance is in violation of university policy. Overall the F assignment does not meet any of the minimum requirements and objectives of the assignment and fails to demonstrate even the most basic use of materials, processes and neither demonstrates an understanding of any concepts.

If there are any questions or comments regarding the above grading criteria feel free to talk to the instructor during class, or after class, or schedule a meeting outside of class.











Page 7

_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________