Assignment 1 - Perspective Assignment (1 Point and 2 Point Perspective)
Mathematics in Art - FA 1020 \ MATH 1020
Due: Tuesday Feb 12
Instructor: Derek Brueckner
Derek.Brueckner@ad.umanitoba.ca
Objectives:
There is the choice of using analogue images or digital images. Either way the idea for this assignment is take two pictures with your camera or select two pictures (photographs from magazines) and depict converging lines, horizon line and vanishing points on each photograph (or reproductions of each photograph) This assignment’s ultimate goal requires people to demonstrate a clear and precise comprehension of 1 Point Perspective in one photograph and 2 Point Perspective in the other photograph with the individual photographs each offering an interesting, challenging and unique solution for each part of the assignment.
The Format and Following Requirements for Assignment:
For this assignment students will attempt to present and depict two photograph examples, which should include:
One photograph example of a 1 point perspective
AND
One photograph example of 2 point perspective
One photograph example of 2 point perspective
(do not staple, paper clip or tape together the two photographs together – to reiterate: first and last name neatly printed on the front of both photographs)
Each photograph example should be on a separate sheet of paper. Both sheets of paper for each photograph image should not be any larger than 8.5 x 11 inches. In some cases people may need to add another sheet of paper to depict the converging lines and vanishing lines but if numerous sheets of paper are required to depict the converging lines and the vanishing points then there is a strong possibility that the image may be too difficult to complete accurately.
On the front of each photograph you must neatly print your first and last name. As the title of each work label the photograph example of the 1 point perspective and label the photograph example of the 2 point perspective.
Analogue Option
To complete this assignment attach a sheet of acetate only at the top of the picture over each photograph then on the surface of the acetate draw: the converging lines to the vanishing point(s) and draw a horizon line. Neatly and accurately draw these converging lines to vanishing points on the acetate. Also label vanishing points and horizon line in both perspective examples. This assignment can be drawn by hand, using a straight edge and a fine tipped marker.
Digital Option
There is also the option of doing this assignment in a digital version by using Photoshop and doing a digital drawing on a digital photo depicting converging lines, a horizon line in each image, labeling vanishing points and horizon line in both perspective examples. Once work is completed then print out each of the digitally manipulated photos on separate sheets of 8.5 x 11 inches. (Obviously if you are not proficient in Photoshop the digital approach will not be an option)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR ASSIGNMENT:
-not discussed in hard copy of assignment handed out in class-
Examples of the 2 Point Perspectives Assignment:
The example presented in the image below on this blog demonstrates a clear understanding of 2 point perspective and even though shows many complex converging lines in a deep space should be more adventurous and unique in terms of subject matter and overall selection of space.
In this example of a two point perspective above (and the detail below) all planes parallel in plan view have converging lines going to 2 points (vanishing points) in the image. As in many image examples such as this image a vanishing point or both points may be located outside the frame of the picture plane. As always these two vanishing points in a two point perspective are both positioned on the horizon line.
As suggested in the above description of the examples presented in this assignment these examples may present an understanding of two point perspective in the assignment but are not stellar examples (See the description of examples in the above text of this assignment why these examples are not stellar) as well the last image above is incomplete and kind of quickly done. In the above work for the assignment the person missed the opportunity to draw in many more converging lines to both vanishing points and the horizon line was not drawn in nor was the work labelled with the title, the vanishing points, or the horizon line.
Some Potential Problems in the Perspective Assignment that will Prevent Elevation of Grade during Evaluation Process:
Inaccurate converging lines
Missing converging lines
Missing vanishing points or mistakes or confusion as to where the vanishing points are located
Simple images which lacked complexity: Overall the subject matter in the 1 point perspective image or in the 2 point perspective image did not offer much for converging lines and was overall a very simple presentation of the concept.
An image that is designated as a 1 point perspective image but is actually a 2 point perspective image or a multiple 2 point perspective image.
In some cases an image that is categorized as a 1 point perspective image or more often a 2 point perspective image is actually a 3 point perspective image. This incorrect categorization of the image then creates confusion regarding the accurate locations of the vanishing points on the horizon line and the overall accurate location of the horizon line. Ultimately these confusions cause the depiction of the vanishing points and (in particular) the horizon line to be positioned inaccurately in the image.
In some cases, over all the work(s) does not demonstrate an understanding of what a 1 point perspective image and or a 2 point perspective image is.
Not labeling assignments on the front of the image with name (printed) and not labeling the vanishing point(s) (VP) and the Horizon Line (HL)
Perspective Assignment Grade (10% of course) and Percentage Breakdown of Assignment:
GPA Grades on Assignment:
1 Point Perspective Image was a GPA grade out 4.5 (5% of course)
2 Point Perspective Image was a GPA grade out 4.5 (5% of course)
Note: GPA grade is out of 4.5
The GPA grade for the entire perspective assignment will be calculated by adding the GPA scores of the 1 Point Perspective Image and the 2 Point Perspective Image and then dividing the total of the two GPA grades by 2.
Grading Example to Determine Score on Perspective Assignment:
GPA score of 1 Point Perspective Image: 3.2
GPA score of 2 Point Perspective Image: + 3.0 GPA total for perspective assignment
6.2 / 2 = 3.1 (out of 4.5)
Check information below (which was copied and pasted from course syllabus) for letter grade chart and scale for GPA grades and additional information regarding grading criteria.
Description of grading scale as listed in art syllabus for Math in Art course:
Description of grading scale as listed in art syllabus for Math in Art course:
Letter Grade Grade Point Value
A+ 4.5 Exceptional
A 4.0 - 4.4 Excellent
B+ 3.5 - 3.9 Very Good
B 3.0 - 3.4 Good
C+ 2.5 - 2.9 Satisfactory
C 2.0 - 2.4 Adequate
D 1.0 - 1.9 Marginal
F 0 – 0.9 Failure
P Pass
S Standing
Additional Information Regarding EVALUATION (Grading Criteria):
Grade of A or A+ (GPA of 4.0 to 4.5) Excellent to Exceptional: A thorough and thoughtful treatment of the assignment presented consistently in an original, logical and convincing manner. The “A” assignment has clearly articulated formal and conceptual ideas, which are innovative, complex, and thoroughly researched. Generally the ”A” assignment demonstrates an excellent level of research, versatility, criticality and a breadth of formal and conceptual skill sets. All of the assignment’s objectives in terms of quality and quantity are achieved in an excellent or exceptional manner. In addition to demonstrating the assignment objectives at an excellent level and synthesizing formal and conceptual elements at an excellent level often an ”A” work offers supplementary strengths as an excellent example of contemporary art and or takes the work beyond and in addition to the assignment’s objectives.
Grade of B or B+ (GPA of 3.0 to 3.9) Good to Very Good: This is a good or very good assignment in most ways, but it is generally less thoughtful than an “A” work. Often “B” assignments are those that mostly repeat what the instructor and the readings have taught, and do so in a way that makes it apparent that the student understands the concepts and objectives, but does not add much to them. The B assignment may be less sophisticated than an “A” assignment, but the “B” is still reasonably competent and conveys ideas and concepts to the viewer. At times the B assignment may offer some innovation or go beyond assignment requirements in certain parts of the assignment but simultaneously may be missing some the assignment’s objectives or those assignment objectives are presented in a less sophisticated manner. Overall, generally in the B assignment the assignment objectives are achieved in a less sophisticated and innovative manner than the A assignment in terms of formal (visual literacy) and conceptual ideas (thematic content).
Grade of C or C+ (GPA of 2.0 to 2.9) Adequate to Satisfactory): An assignment that shows an understanding of most concepts and objectives involved in the assignment, but does not treat it thoroughly or does not synthesize the assignment into an entirely clear manner. In the C assignment the ideas are visually and or conceptually vague and may appear to be contradictory, or visually noisy or confused. Strong effort by a student may be given for a C assignment, but the work struggles to convey the assignment objectives in terms of demonstrating visual literacy and conceptual ideas in the work.
Grade of D (GPA of 1.0 to 1.9) Marginal: Seriously flawed. The assignment neither demonstrates an understanding of the material nor articulates any coherent ideas or concepts. The assignment might wander among several ideas with out developing any single one. There is no focus in this kind of work. Often a D assignment will be presented as incomplete or unfinished. In a “D” assignment a student might rely on others’ work rather than developing her/his ideas. The instructor might wonder if the student tried at all.
